Sunday, March 10, 2024

A Conditioned Perception of Time


Society is organized to a point that each stage of the human lifecycle is prescribed in tandem with an institution: school when you're a kid; college when you're older; then supposedly you are solidified with employment at some point in your 20s; even in an extended sense, an institution is meant to look after you when you're decrepit. Because these checkpoints have become so integrated into society, people intuitively associate the flow of time with personal growth. Normies perceive time as moving through events, where each human is constantly mobile from checkpoint to checkpoint, regardless of how they actually perform. The way I see it, you attain something when you've attained it, otherwise you are just floating through academia. A healthier way to perceive reality is yourself as a stationary being, with time, by which we mean achievement, moving as far as you do, with or without the alignment of institutional aid. Christmas, Halloween and easter are useful for one, giving people a sense of relief between months, and more so in the case of Christmas, keeping track of time in order to allow people to reflect and plan for the future. The flip side of this is that people begin to see time as something progressive, and not something which changes as you change itThis behavior is fine for the grain slave, but not for someone smart enough to bypass snagging conventions to succeed. Namely because time doesn't move through Christmases and certificates, but action. Such conventions as education were perfected along with English common law, which became the template for America and its settler stock. The polar opposite to the law abiding gentile within the white race would be Italians. The only blonde one would be German Americans, with their own schools and interest groups—which were banned during the war. The Italians survived with such things intact for partially associating with another group, culturally and within white collar crime. While Celts and Germanics were chasing pigs in the forests of central Europe, Italians were detecting hacks to make life easier, such as aqueducts and indoor heating. Conventionally they should have just farmed before winter and prayed to the blonde man's fortune totembut the spirit of their race is that of gangsters and entrepreneurs, to transcend conventions where most tribes wouldn't think to, thereby inheriting the right to command them as masters, as did the Roman empire. As racketeers avoid common law to these ends, the Italian mind bears that instinct in its DNA to deal the same within all states of play. When Celt-Germanics earnestly adopted Christianity, Italians used it to perfect a power structure lasting to this day as the Vatican. To return to my point, English common law and societal structure existed in America to be taken advantage of by the same race which conquered the countries blonde ancestors by the same means. For people who didn't grow up around Italians, you can see the effects of this reflected in The Sopranos. There's no retirement home for elder members of the community, because such an institution belongs to the system which the Italian criminal mind has been alien to since Ellis Island, and if you go to university, it's to learn how to become a doctor or a lawyer, white collar jobs which formal teachings are necessary to grasp. The emphasis of Italian culture, moreover immigrant culture, moreover organized criminal culture, is cohesion of the clan against parasitism of the external world. In contrast, flag saluting motherfuckers (save for the extinct German Identity) tend to leave that aspect of their responsibility, the most existential, to schools. Reliance upon institutions disarms people of their wits in general. The most hostile instance of this to the cohesion of the family is the replacement of the parent as a mentor by institutions. The only thing the generation of the 60s revolution took from right wing thought was the idealism that people fend for themselves in the world. This isn't for the love of any ideology, but the fact that they can't be asked to train their own progeny to succeed. This draws back to the perception of time being linier through checkpoints, whereby at one stage within the adult kalpa, the laws of physics cease to exist in regards to offspring, and any uncertainties are assumed to be taken care of, wherever they're sent. The ethic justifies that once a child is out of the house, it's not the parents' responsibility to guide them further, and if they fail in life, its either the fault of their weakness within a Darwinian capitalism, or maybe the colleges. That's what your parents actually spent money on. If you complain they can site the fact that they paid all that money for your sake, when really all they did was invest in an excuse for their own sloth, as a generation pathologized by an American Ethic. That law secures them to feel morally safe as their own genetic future fails. It has to be acknowledged that in addition to laziness, boomers may not know how to survive by initiative, as their parents did, and how their children must, because all their generation had to do was follow the carrot at a time when Uni was less of a scam. Either way, you are still following rules and commands in doing so, therefore are not exercised of the ability to think three dimensionally within a dynamic world. Without that skill, they are doomed to look for a box to tick where there isn't one, because the bureaucratic world which relies on those formats is in the late stages of deteriorating. This impotence leaves them with the only thing they can offer to their young, which is vague jabs about millennials looking at screens all day. When their sons and daughters do fail they can site the fact that they had warned them; they can't site that they weren't absent in your development, but that they were snarky about the fact that you don't have any skills from their neglect. There's a telling video on Youtube simulating what its like to have to deal with this attitude. (It's weird how Hollywood has pathologized the trope of the father who wants his kid to go into the family business, but the kid just wants to be a twink or an artist or something. I would much prefer an immediate opening over the reality of what most parents are actually like having grown up with that messaging.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRGaf-m1V54

'Get out of the house' is a synonym for either get a job or go to some kind of social event to get laid. Boomers don't have the initiative to actually know that's what they mean, so they rely on a metaphorical phrase instead. In the past, there may have been social clubs, admittedly with people more outgoing. But if I'm a Millennial, my personal skills are online, my friends if any are online, my looking for a job is online too. The only modern UK social clubs are set up to encourage black people not to stab each other. When authority figures are impotent to communicate usefully, they develop Carmela Soprano syndrome, relying on menial conventions to instruct people to follow as an excuse to remain social beings, non of which actually make a dent in the flow of time for any party. If not that, than it just goes back to the superiority complex of being raised by an electric box over an electric screen. It may seem cruel and harsh, but in reality, boomer parents are helpless to do anything else. The snide remarks like 'look who finally decided to come out of their room' are all they have, since the instinct to act within a lawless environment devoid of promises and schedules has been completely obliterated from their disposition, in the assumption that society would take care of matters in their timeline.

I am reminded of Vito Corleone  as a young man standing in that wooden apartment, looking at his baby crying. In the realm of physics you exist within a close and tangible state of play, where the initiative to move your surroundings within the present is essential. That's the instinct which was eroded, and which only a cunt hair's percentage of our generation will have survived by as the rest clog up the catering market.

12 comments:

  1. Why did you remove 'the literally me thing'' and ''Intergating my philosophy''? They were some of my fav blog posts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because he’s a fucking faggot

      Delete
  2. hi, if you still need any of your old oney comps, heres a list of the ones i have archived (including the original descriptions and thumbnails): https://rentry.co/oneycomp/raw

    i can upload them wherever you like, if youre intersted my email is noscearmor@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can upload those videos to Youtube with the original descriptions and thumbnails. That's probably the easier option considering how many there are. I'll copy them onto my own channel so they're all in one place with the rest of them.

      Just send me a link. My discord is: ottoheckel#1925

      Thanks btw

      Delete
  3. I love all these blogs but without offense this one just felt all over the place. You begin with the premise of time, and make a decent point about it but then jump into talking about italians and the roman empire and germanics for half the text without being able to make any real poignant point, and then you end it with a decent analysis of boomer mentality. I really like "Boomers don't have the initiative to actually know that's what they mean, so they rely on a metaphorical phrase instead", I feel like that's a very concise way of expaining a lot of boomer mentality, but wasn't this supposed to be about conception of time through institutions and stages? Shouldn't you have connected that with the feeling of being lost and sort of trapped in time of the current generations, because we view time as stepping through institutions and right now that's become completely distorted? Maybe that's why so many of these masses are aesthetically obsessed with the "lofi loli" degeneracy even, none of these people FEEL like adults, they're completely unaware they even are, because they have no feeling of the passage of time that's been phycologically/culturally/conventionally(/whatever you will) defined through institutions, idk. Anyways keep up the good work my dude

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think this is an AI comment to wind me up. But the point was that due to their history Italian immigrant descendants don't adhere to the perception of time which institutions impose on people, but those (particularly boomers) descended from Celt-Germanics are, because they're native to those power structures and historically good at following conventions, over thinking for themselves as Italians benefitting from breaking the law during prohibition did.

      Delete
  4. this was fun to read. have you considered your own biases and how they deeply affect your (writing on) perception of people's perceptions of time? i am interested in the idea that perhaps certain cultures have a different "societal rhythm", either in the form of social classes or economic ones which may fall out of sync in certain circumstances.

    this may just be yet another hurdle, but i recommend (in my worthless opinion) that you do one topic at a time, perhaps tackling a basic idea and then expanding on it further in later posts, instead of reaching the climax so early. there are a lot of claims in this post which might be substantiated by proof, evidence, or the scientific method, but are instead overwritten by even more claims.

    as far as simple dialectics go, i agree with some of your writing. i think real substantial evidence could turn this from inane ramblings to a news headline or manifesto. instead, your post has juggled a ton of ideas without developing the foundation further, leading to what many would perceive as incoherent (but surprisingly convincing) bath of half-truths.

    expand on the relationship of culture with the so-called "societal rhythm", once it can be said for certain that such a thing exists, devise a test to explore its different avenues, such as the "sub-cultural rhythms" borne of sharp generational divides, the incompatibility of institutions with their subjects, and social movements. you don't have to take shots in the dark, there are ways to explore truth which have been used for thousands of years, but was only solidly outlined in the late 17th century.

    i also recommend you look into the irish "troubles", and how a cultural/moral divide (be it religious, ethnic, or otherwise) could rip a society apart before anyone could even identify the cause.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds interesting but I can't believe the Troubles were real because you didn't link a source. Also Italians didn't emigrate to America during the turn of the century. I made it up, otherwise I would have sited a source. English common law isn't real either, I made it up, and America wasn't initially settled by WASPs, it was settled by Mongolians: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/resizer/v2/D5ZHMY4TI5ECHC6PX4EIDWLGPY?auth=e422e2e25802118b930839ab8256d85a44947c4920789677eb14eba04c2c44b0&width=1200&quality=80

      Delete
  5. Youre the biggest fucking nigger faggot of all time blogging like a fucking school girl on her Facebook wall go kill yourself with a hollow point round so your faggot brains are put to use to paint the wall with a red abstract art piece called “faggots favor for family”

    ReplyDelete