A Conditioned Perception of Time

Society is organized to a point that each stage of the human lifecycle is prescribed in tandem with an institution: school when you're a kid, college when you're older, then supposedly you are solidified with employment at some point in your 20s; even in an extended sense, an institution is meant to look after you when you're decrepit. Because these checkpoints have become so integrated into society, people intuitively associate the flow of time with personal growth. Normies perceive time as moving through events, where each human is constantly mobile from checkpoint to checkpoint, regardless of how they actually perform. The way I see it, you attain something when you've detained it, otherwise you are just floating through academia. A healthier way to perceive reality is yourself as a stationary being, with time, by which we mean achievement, moving as far as you do, with or without the alignment of institutional aid.

Christmas, Halloween and easter are useful for one, giving people a sense of relief between months, and more in the case of Christmas, keeping track of time in order to allow people to reflect and plan for the future. The flip side of this is that people begin to see time as something progressive, and not something which changes as you change it. This behavior is fine for the grain slave, but not for someone smart enough to bypass snagging conventions in order to succeed. Namely because time doesn't move through Christmases and certificates, but action.

Such conventions as education were perfected along with English common law, which became the template for America and its settler stock. The polar opposite to the law abiding gentile within the white race would be Italians. The only blonde one would be German Americans, with their own schools and interest groups, but they were banned during the war. The Italians survived with such things intact for partially associating with another group, culturally and within white collar crime.

While Celts and Germanics were chasing pigs in the forests of central Europe, Italians were detecting hacks to make life easier, such as indoor heating and aqueducts. Conventionally they should have just farmed before winter and prayed to the blonde man's fortune totem—but the spirit of their race is that of gangsters and entrepreneurs, to transcend conventions where most tribes wouldn't think to, thereby inheriting the right to command them as masters, as did the Roman empire. As racketeers avoid common law to these ends, the Italian mind bears that instinct in its DNA to deal the same within all states of play. When Celt-Germanics earnestly adopted Christianity, Italians used it to perfect a power structure lasting to this day as the Vatican. To return to my point, English common law and societal structure existed in America to be taken advantage of by the same race which conquered the countries blonde ancestors by the same means. 

For people who didn't grow up around Italians, you can see the effects of this reflected in The Sopranos. There's no retirement home for elder members of the community, because such an institution belongs to the system which the Italian criminal mind has been alien to since Ellis Island, and if you go to university, it's to learn how to become a doctor or a lawyer, white collar jobs which formal teachings are necessary to grasp. The emphasis of Italian culture, moreover immigrant culture, moreover organized criminal culture, is cohesion of the clan against parasitism of the external world. In contrast, flag saluting motherfuckers (save for the extinct German Identity) tend to leave that aspect of their responsibility, the most existential, to schools. Reliance upon institutions disarms people of their wits in general. The most hostile instance of this to the cohesion of the family is the replacement of the parent as a mentor by institutions. 

The only thing the generation of the 60s revolution took from right wing thought was the idealism that people fend for themselves in the world. This isn't for the love of any ideology, but the fact that they can't be asked to train their own progeny to succeed. 

This draws back to the perception of time being linier through checkpoints, whereby at one stage within the adult kalpa, the laws of physics cease to exist in regards to offspring, and any uncertainties are assumed to be taken care of by whatever complex they're sent to. The ethic justifies that once a child is out of the house, it's not the parents' responsibility to guide them further, and if they fail in life, its either the fault of their weakness within a Darwinian capitalism, or maybe the colleges. That's what your parents actually spent money on. If you complain they can site the fact that they paid all that money for your sake, when really all they did was invest in an excuse for their own sloth, as a generation pathologized by an American Ethic. That law secures them to feel morally safe as their own genetic future fails. 

It has to be acknowledged that in addition to laziness, boomers may not know how to survive on initiative, as their parents did, and how their children must, because all their generation had to do was follow the carrot at a time when Uni was less of a scam. Either way, you are still following rules and commands in doing so, therefore are not exercised of the ability to think three dimensionally within a dynamic world. Without that skill, they are doomed to look for a box to tick where there isn't one, because the bureaucratic world which relies on those formats is in the late stages of deteriorating. This impotence leaves them with the only thing they can offer to their young, which is vague jabs about millennials looking at screens all day. When their sons and daughters do fail they can site the fact that they had warned them; they can't site that they weren't absent in your development, but that they were snarky about the fact that you don't have any skills from their neglect. There's a telling video on Youtube simulating what its like to have to deal with this attitude. (It's weird how Hollywood has pathologized the trope of the father who wants his kid to go into the family business, but the kid just wants to be a twink or an artist or something. I would much prefer an immediate opening over the reality of what most parents are actually like having grown up with that messaging.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRGaf-m1V54

'Get out of the house' is a synonym for either get a job or go to some kind of social event to get laid. Boomers don't have the initiative to actually know that's what they mean, so they rely on a metaphorical phrase instead. In the past, there may have been social clubs, admittedly with people more outgoing. But if I'm a Millennial, my personal skills are online, my friends if any are online, my looking for a job is online too. The only modern UK social clubs are set up to encourage black people not to stab each other.

When authority figures are impotent to communicate usefully, they develop Carmela Soprano syndrome, relying on menial conventions to instruct people to follow as an excuse to remain social beings, non of which actually make a dent in the flow of time for any party. If not that, than it just goes back to the superiority complex of being raised by an electric box over an electric screen. 

It may seem cruel and harsh, but in reality, boomer parents are helpless to do anything else. The snide remarks like 'look who finally decided to come out of their room' are all they have, since the instinct to act within a lawless environment devoid of promises and schedules has been completely obliterated from their disposition, in the assumption that society would take care of matters in their timeline.

I am reminded of Vito Corleone  as a young man standing in that wooden apartment, looking at his baby crying. In the realm of physics you exist within a close and tangible state of play, where the initiative to move your surroundings within the present is essential. That's the instinct which was eroded, and which only a cunt hair's percentage of our generation will have survived by as the rest clog up the catering market.